Work on what matters most. Catapult handles the rest.
Built uniquely for you, Catapult understands your work as if it's been
with you since day one. Every email, message, meeting and document.
So it knows your tone, your priorities, the context behind your
decisions. It anticipates what you need before you think to ask, and
helps you get it done.
It drafts your replies in your voice. It preps you for the meeting,
then follows through on what you promised. It catches what you'd have
missed. It thinks through the hard problems with everything you've
ever worked on in front of it. And the more it learns, the more it
does that you never thought to ask for.
No explaining yourself. No uploading context. No markdown files, no
workflows to build. It just works.
We're a small, obsessed team of repeat founders, researchers, and
engineers — from
Meta,
Amazon Research,
Oxford,
Cambridge, and
Imperial building Catapult for
ourselves, and for people like us.
Drafting emails in your voice,
with the right context, ready to send. Especially the thorny
ones.
Reply to David from Jupiter about Catapult's US bank account
David needs the missing information to open your US bank
account. I’ve found everything and drafted your reply.
Rav
Hi David,
I’ve sent over the initial company details for the US account.
This includes Catapult’s incorporation information, UK company address, and the US subsidiary setup documents you asked for.
Let me know if Jupiter needs anything else from me.
Best, Rav
David Morgan
Hi Rav,
Thanks for sending the initial company details through.
Could you send the remaining account-opening details when you have a moment?
Jupiter still needs the account purpose, expected products, average monthly balance, and whether payroll will run through it.
Once I have those, I can pass this to onboarding.
Best, David
Email draft
· Replying in thread
ToDavid@jupiter.com
Managing your schedule around
your priorities: creating events, suggesting times, fixing
conflicts.
Schedule 3 year service review with Carla
Carla followed up asking to schedule Catapult's Year 3
Service Review for your office space.
I've created the invite for Friday June 5,
10:00-11:00am BST, which is a clear free slot. If that
works, I'll also draft the email reply back to her for you.
Preparing you for the meetings that matter,
with everything you need to know, ask, and do.
Cian Murphy research engineer interview - Meeting prep ready
Here's the context
You have Cian / Rav - 30min Meeting
on Fri June 24, 12:30 to 13:00 EST.
He's already shown initiative, asking for an earlier
slot, and sending you his Github repo, and ideas for
Catapult.
What to focus on in the call
Understand CV gaps: I analysed his
CV, and there's an 11-month gap between his time at
Meta, and joining OpenAI. His LinkedIn profile implies
one job started after another. Dig deeper on this.
Systems depth: he said the project
he's most proud of was his memory system. Push him on
this, given Catapult's built a long-term, dynamic
memory system that updates in real time. How would he
build this from scratch?
Career focus: he's worked in pure
research roles as well as pure engineering roles.
Both at startups he's built, as well as for the likes
of Meta and OpenAI. Why Catapult, and why now? Look
out to see where his eyes light up around the work he
enjoys.
Beyond these, ask your usual questions. Let me know if
there's any other research I can do ahead of the call.
Whether it's finding his latest tweets or blog posts.
Sources
Handling every promise and action item,
the moment the meeting ends.
Send Greg the product feedback from the call with Sam
Here's the context
From your Granola meeting note, Sam said he's really
enjoying Catapult. He's surprised by how well it
knows him, has cancelled his Claude subscription, and
is using Superhuman less for email.
He shared a few product ideas: a Daily Briefing of
work Catapult did overnight, importing his Claude
memories, and keyboard shortcuts.
You said you'd share the feedback with Greg. I've
drafted the message for you.
Slack message→ Gregory Wilsenach
hey Greg! Sam's loving Catapult, he's even cancelling his claude sub. He had 3 requests for the roadmap: a daily briefing, a way to import his memories from claude, and keyboard shortcuts.
I know we're already working on the daily briefing, defo worth you chatting to Sam further on this.
Sources
Thinking through the hard problems,
with everything you've ever worked on in context.
Commitments you've made across your work
What have I dropped the ball on?
Highest priority
Eric Jones: lock the Friday
onboarding time. He replied asking to "shoot for
Friday," but I don't see a confirmed slot or reply
yet.
Mercury: complete onboarding to get
your US bank account set up.
Landing page: update the text based
on the team's feedback.
3 invoices due today: pay Goodrise,
Anthropic and Google Cloud.
Hiring
Inderjit Singh: send the interview
outcome. Seems like a reject based on your Granola
notes.
Mark Cristoph: move him to the loop
with the rest of the team - you're all free next
Tuesday.
Founder's Associate: review the 29
pending applicants.
Go to market
Approve new Alpha users: Greg
mentioned we have capacity for 20 new users to
onboard.
Review your outreach metrics: you've
got a couple weeks of data to look at.
Sources
Catching what you'd miss.
Users about to churn, leads going cold, failed payments.
Surfaced before they slip.
Things I've handled for you
Today
Yesterday
Do your life's best work, and help the world do theirs
We're building at the frontier of AI, solving problems that look
impossible: dynamic long-term memory, proactive agents, context
engines that understand your work like you do.
Between us, we've built and scaled startups, published in top
journals, and shipped everything from quantum random number generators
to local coding agents.
Join us,
and spend your best years changing how the world works.
Things we get asked
Which models do you use?
Two things make Catapult work.
The first is the live model we build of your work: a deep
understanding of everything you've ever worked on. That's the part
we've pioneered, and it's what sets Catapult apart.
The second is how we answer your questions. There we stay
model-agnostic. We continuously test the best agents available and
match each task to whichever one handles it best, so you always get
the strongest result.
Does Catapult have memory?
Yes, and it's real memory, not the shallow kind.
Most tools "remember" by re-fetching a handful of recent messages
the moment you ask, then starting from zero next time. Catapult
builds a living model of your work and keeps it current in the
background. It learns what's top of mind this week, the people you
work with, your tone and preferences, what's coming next, and what's
starting to slip.
Because it holds the context of every conversation, you never repeat
yourself or re-explain what you meant last time.
Ask what's on your plate and Catapult can write your week back to
you, often more clearly than you would yourself. That's when it
stops feeling like a tool and starts feeling like someone who
already knows you.
How does Catapult compare to Hermes, OpenClaw and Claude Cowork?
Catapult is different in two ways that matter.
It's proactive, not prompted. Cowork and Hermes,
and OpenClaw wait for you to assign a task: you open the app, point
it at a folder, write a prompt. Catapult watches what's happening
across your work, from emails to Slack to meetings, and starts on
things before you ask. The bug ticket is drafted before you've seen
the Slack message. The investor follow-up is waiting when you sit
down.
It's built on deep, pre-existing context. This is
the bigger one. Cowork, Hermes and OpenClaw rely on MCPs (Model
Context Protocol connectors) or CLIs to pull in information the
moment you ask. That sounds fine in theory. In practice it means:
They start from zero every time. Each task is
like opening an incognito window: a few live API calls to Gmail,
Slack, or Drive, a thin slice of recent data, whatever fits in the
context window. No memory of you, your work, or your patterns.
The context is patchy. MCPs return whatever the
underlying API exposes, which is usually far less than what's
actually in your work. Attachments are the obvious one: most can't
read them, so a thread about a contract becomes a thread about
"the attached PDF." Same for images in Slack, linked docs,
embedded tables, and anything behind a reference.
They can't see across sources. A call to Gmail
returns emails. A call to Slack returns messages. Nothing joins
them up. If the answer lives half in an email, half in a Slack DM,
and half in a Notion doc from three months ago, you're the one
stitching it together.
Retrieval is shallow and recent. MCPs are good
at "the last 20 messages in this channel," bad at "what did we
decide about pricing six months ago, and who pushed back." The
model never learns your history. It just keeps re-fetching
fragments of it.
Catapult works the other way around. Instead of pulling context at
query time, it builds a persistent model of your work in the
background. It ingests everything: emails and their attachments,
Slack threads and the images in them, docs, meetings, the calendar,
the lot. It keeps that model current as you work, so when Catapult
acts, it already knows the context: your tone, your priorities, the
commitments you've made, the threads that matter. It doesn't have to
go look.
How secure is Catapult?
Your data is yours. It's encrypted in transit and at rest, and it's
never used to train third-party models. We comply with GDPR, and
we're currently completing SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certification with
Vanta.
Does Catapult act without my permission?
No. We believe you should have the final say on everything Catapult
does. Catapult prepares work for you to review, so you can hit send
or take the action.
We use cookies to improve your experience and understand how people use Catapult.